Search results for "Posterior Group Membership Probability"
showing 10 items of 16 documents
Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the Ceratitis fasciventris, C. anonae, C. rosa complex (Diptera, Tephritidae)
2015
Abstract Previous attempts to resolve the Ceratitis FAR complex (Ceratitis fasciventris, Ceratitis anonae, Ceratitis rosa, Diptera, Tephritidae) showed contrasting results and revealed the occurrence of five microsatellite genotypic clusters (A, F1, F2, R1, R2). In this paper we explore the potential of wing morphometrics for the diagnosis of FAR morphospecies and genotypic clusters. We considered a set of 227 specimens previously morphologically identified and genotyped at 16 microsatellite loci. Seventeen wing landmarks and 6 wing band areas were used for morphometric analyses. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance detected significant differences both across morphospecies and g…
Supplementary material 13 from: Van Cann J, Virgilio M, Jordaens K, De Meyer M (2015) Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the …
2015
Individual assignments to genotypic clusters A, F1, F2, R1, R2: Explanation note: Posterior group membership probabilities (PGMPs) of male and female specimens as resulting from Discriminant Analysis of Principal Coordinates of wing landmarks (upper) or wing band areas (lower). Prior groups: A, F1, F2, R1, R2 (from white to dark blue).
Supplementary material 11 from: Van Cann J, Virgilio M, Jordaens K, De Meyer M (2015) Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the …
2015
Constrained ordination of wing band areas: Explanation note: Discriminant analysis of principal coordinates (DAPC) maximising morphometric differences in wing band areas between males and females (a) Ceratitis anonae, Ceratitis fasciventris and Ceratitis rosa and (b) genotypic clusters A, F1, F2, R1, R2.
Supplementary material 8 from: Van Cann J, Virgilio M, Jordaens K, De Meyer M (2015) Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the C…
2015
Unconstrained ordination of wing landmarks: Explanation note: Principal component analysis (PCA) showing morphometric differences in wing landmarks between males and females (a) Ceratitis anonae, Ceratitis fasciventris and Ceratitis rosa and (b) genotypic clusters A, F1, F2, R1, R2.
Supplementary material 4 from: Van Cann J, Virgilio M, Jordaens K, De Meyer M (2015) Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the C…
2015
Wing landmarks and wing band areas: Explanation note: Position of wing landmarks and wing band areas (numbers according to Suppl. material 3).
Supplementary material 12 from: Van Cann J, Virgilio M, Jordaens K, De Meyer M (2015) Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the …
2015
Average individual assignments: Explanation note: Average individual posterior group membership probabilities (PGMPs) of male and female specimens of three morphospecies (Ceratitis anonae, Ceratitis fasciventris and Ceratitis rosa) and five genotypic clusters (A, F1, F2, R1, R2) as resulting from the analysis of wing landmarks (light grey) and wing band areas (dark grey).
Supplementary material 2 from: Van Cann J, Virgilio M, Jordaens K, De Meyer M (2015) Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the C…
2015
Map of sampling locations: Explanation note: Number of sampled specimens for each morphospecies are indicated in parentheses.
Supplementary material 9 from: Van Cann J, Virgilio M, Jordaens K, De Meyer M (2015) Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the C…
2015
Unconstrained ordination of wing band areas: Explanation note: Principal component analysis (PCA) showing morphometric differences in wing band areas between males and females (a) Ceratitis anonae, Ceratitis fasciventris and Ceratitis rosa and (b) genotypic clusters A, F1, F2, R1, R2.
Supplementary material 15 from: Van Cann J, Virgilio M, Jordaens K, De Meyer M (2015) Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the …
2015
Morphometric differences across genotypic clusters (wing band areas): Explanation note: PERMANOVA and a posteriori comparisons (t-statistic) testing differences in multivariate patterns of wing band areas among morphospecies (Ceratitis anonae, Ceratitis fasciventris, Ceratitis rosa). d.f.: degrees of freedom; MS: mean square estimates; F: pseudo-F. Probability of Monte Carlo simulations: n.s.: not significant a P<0.05; ***: P<0.001, **: P<0.01; *: P<0.05 (after False Discovery Rate Correction for repeated a posteriori comparisons).
Supplementary material 5 from: Van Cann J, Virgilio M, Jordaens K, De Meyer M (2015) Wing morphometrics as a possible tool for the diagnosis of the C…
2015
Preliminary methodological experiment: unconstrained ordination of wing landmarks: Explanation note: Principal component analysis (PCA) showing morphometric differences in wing landmarks of 14 Ceratitis rosa specimens across sexes (M, F), wings (LW: left wing, RW: right wing), repeated images of the same wing (1, 2), repeated measures of the same image (A, B).